Paper trading is widely discussed regarding its merits, and whether it is of value to a speculator as they try to make the cross over to a real income speculator. One viewpoint is that since paper trading is not real, the gains are meaningless, and are no indication of a real income profitability. An opposite viewpoint would binomio corretora declare that paper trading is an important step up the trader’s learning further development, and regardless of whether it is real, if the speculator cannot ‘properly’ paper trade, then they will not be able to a real income trade.
I began trading in early 1995, with the purposes of becoming an options speculator; my first trading education was by using an oex options teaching service. Besides options training, the service included ‘tape’ reading, trade management AND sp500 index futures trading – also included in the service was the prevalent attitude that paper trading was for ‘sissies’.
So i was a new speculator, trying to learn and understand completely new concepts and ideas – what was called a trading method AND I was ‘practicing’ with a real income – because paper trading was for ‘sissies’. What did I accomplish, besides a big draw down in my account? I quickly introduced to trading mindsets and the related benefits – something else I also knew nothing about. Losing money and a trading mindsets ‘wreck’, both from the losses and thoughts like I was too ‘stupid’ to ever learn how to trade, became a combination which took me out of futures trading, and then unfortunately carried over into my options trading which i had previously been doing well with. We couldn’t take it any more – I had to somehow start all over, or just quit for good.
Paper Trading Viewpoints
Consider: simulator fill prices are not real and won’t be attainable with a real income. Even if this is correct, is it really an issue unless the speculator intends to be a scalper, trading for small profits, and thus each break is important? Granted, but shouldn’t a beginning speculator be very selective, focusing on learning their method and the ‘best’ setups that method provides? This would be my viewpoint, and in this capacity paper trading fill prices are not an issue.
Consider: the trades are usually now being finished with no risk. No, there isn’t any financial risk in paper trading, but I actually haven’t met nearly as many profitable paper traders jointly might expect. Why would this are the case if being able to trade without risk was such an easy thing to do? As well, notice speedier self-esteem risk, and an attitude like – how can i be so bad that can’t even paper trade? The risk feelings like these are probably greater than that of financial risk, and if they should surface, you would want to encounter them before trading a real income. As well, even if the issue was only one of financial risk – wouldn’t you want to choose the confidence of knowing that which you were paper trading profitable? It would be hard to imagine a losing paper trading being able to profitably trade a real income.
Consider: there is no sentiment involved with paper trading. I was in our chat room watching a paper speculator post their trades in order for me to give them feedback, and I pointed out that one of their specific plan setups has not been done. When i asked why, the speculator told me that they were ahead for the day and didn’t want to risk those profits. But the profits aren’t real – how can you not take a ‘base’ method setup when paper trading – isn’t that the point? Would you be in agreement, that if paper trading profits could be viewed in this fashion, that it has the capacity to become very real and thus emotional to the speculator? I would suggest that this is related to paper trading really not being ‘so easy’, and as mentioned above, self-esteem risk can be very emotional.
Besides examples like this, emotions can be added to the paper trading process. Throw away your simulator, and then go into a chat room and post all of your trades – no ‘youknowwhating’ around where you wait to see if the trade was profitable before you post it, like a number of traders that have observed. What’s the attachment site, and when you consider the underlying benefits of ‘needing’ to do this – the issue certainly isn’t about whether paper trading is of value or not, but certainly best to find out before trading a real income. You must post immediately and without lag, giving your direction and entry price, along with subsequent posts of any somewhat profits, and of course your exit, which ultimately is the determinant of whether the trade was profitable. There is no need to make any comments, or answer any questions regarding your trades – simply post the particulars as fast and real time as possible And see if you feel any emotions doing this in front of the rest of the room while you go through a series of losses. Do you wish to add even more emotions? Go through the same posting process, but do so where the rest of the room actually knows the process that you are trading, and what the trades ‘should’ be. You will quickly find out how emotional paper trading can be – actually a very valuable exercise for the paper speculator to do.
Paper Trading And Making it Further Beneficial
I have two predominant problems with paper trading, but this is with the trader’s approach, and not with paper trading by definition: (1) the speculator does ‘things’ paper trading that they would-could not do with a real income (2) the speculator views paper trading profitability, instead of paper trading proficiency, as the guideline of whether they are ready to begin trading a real income.
I have seen too many paper traders, continuously and knowingly, over trade ‘non-plan’ trades, with trading size that is greater than they could afford the margin for in a real account – not to say accept the risk of loss, while also holding trades for risk amounts that they would not accept with a real income. Viewing paper trading as a ‘step’ in the learning further development and cross over to a real income trading, it’s vital that the paper speculator only trades exactly what, and how they would trade with a real income. Don’t allow yourself to turn paper trading into a game, apparently because there is no risk – the risk of making bad habits that you can’t correct is tremendous, and will circumvent any attempt to trade a real income. This is the time to learn YOUR basic trading setups, and make necessary adjustments to them and your entry-exit timing, in order to then make money trading them – this is not the time to turn your simulator into a pinball machine flipping at any ball that comes near you.
There is a problem with focusing on trading profitability -vs- trading proficiency. To begin with, profitability places the focus on money instead of on plan. And what is profitability – invest the 10 trades and make $75 are you profitable? Technically, if you are net ahead you are profitable, but what if those same 10 trades had a potential of $1, 500, and you only made $75 – are you really profitable? This is just what I am referring to when i think of trading proficiency. Instead of focusing on the common metrics, such as win: loss or win size: loss size ratios, I am most concerned with the win size: potential win size ratio, and want to maximize this percentage to the extent that is possible.
For instance, when a speculator asks about adding trading size, taking the attitude that if they can make $100 trading 3 contracts, they likely can make $1, 000 by trading 30 contracts, the first thing I ask them is what is their proficiency ratio – why increase contract size and the equivalent trading risk, if you ‘should’ be able to earn more income from smaller size? This is especially important for the paper speculator, where they should not regard simple profitability as an indication of readiness to trade a real income, but consider proficiency – for instance, begin trading a real income when you are 60-70 percent proficient with your paper trades.
So what Is your Viewpoint Regarding Paper Trading?
I never thought that would ever make a dime trading, not to say be able to trade for a living or become involved with trying to teach others to trade – was this merely a function of starting over and paper trading? Granted that is too simplistic, however, I do know that it would have certainly changed the start that had, while very much shortening my learning competition, and reducing a lot of pain.
Clearly, I am on the ‘side’ that believes that paper trading is not only beneficial, but that paper trading is also necessary – however the value received will be influenced by the trader’s approach and attitude. Needless to say, paper trading as described is something that I have always strongly recommended.